[sunset4] IP on draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf

[Marc Blanchet]

Dear author,
please state if you have direct, personal knowledge of any IPR related
to this document (draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf), and if yes, was it
disclosed, in conformance with BCPs 78 and 79.

Regards, Marc, document shepherd

[Lee Howard]

Lol
I know of no IPR related to this draft.

Lee

Sent from my iPhone

Post by Marc Blanchet
Dear author,
please state if you have direct, personal knowledge of any IPR related to this document (draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf), and if yes, was it disclosed, in conformance with BCPs 78 and 79.
Regards, Marc, document shepherd
_______________________________________________
sunset4 mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4

[Jacques Latour]

Hi,

I know I'm late on the reviewing part, but just wondering how the policing part will work, who will ensure the "IETF work will explicitly support IPv6" activities?

Second, as an example, when this come in effect, would this draft "https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-09" specifically exclude IPv4 specifications, meaning this new framework work should only be applied to IPv6, and ideally make IPv6 feature rich vs. IPv4.

Jacques


-----Original Message-----
From: sunset4 [mailto:sunset4-***@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lee Howard
Sent: September 19, 2017 9:37 AM
To: MarcBlanchet <***@viagenie.ca>
Cc: draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-***@ietf.org; ***@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [sunset4] IP on draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf

Lol
I know of no IPR related to this draft.

Lee

Sent from my iPhone

Post by Marc Blanchet
Dear author,
please state if you have direct, personal knowledge of any IPR related to this document (draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf), and if yes, was it disclosed, in conformance with BCPs 78 and 79.
Regards, Marc, document shepherd
_______________________________________________
sunset4 mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4

[Marc Blanchet]

Post by Jacques Latour
Hi,
I know I'm late on the reviewing part, but just wondering how the
policing part will work, who will ensure the "IETF work will
explicitly support IPv6" activities?

I think that this is out of the wg remit and shall be handled by IESG.
My guess is there will be many implications that the IESG will have to
deal with.

Marc.

Post by Jacques Latour
Second, as an example, when this come in effect, would this draft
"https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-09"
specifically exclude IPv4 specifications, meaning this new framework
work should only be applied to IPv6, and ideally make IPv6 feature
rich vs. IPv4.
Jacques
-----Original Message-----
Sent: September 19, 2017 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: [sunset4] IP on draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf
Lol
I know of no IPR related to this draft.
Lee
Sent from my iPhone

On Sep 19, 2017, at 8:08 AM, Marc Blanchet
Dear author,
please state if you have direct, personal knowledge of any IPR
related to this document (draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf), and if yes,
was it disclosed, in conformance with BCPs 78 and 79.
Regards, Marc, document shepherd
_______________________________________________
sunset4 mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4

_______________________________________________
sunset4 mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4

[Lee Howard]

On 9/19/17, 9:54 AM, "sunset4 on behalf of Jacques Latour"

Post by Jacques Latour
Hi,
I know I'm late on the reviewing part, but just wondering how the
policing part will work, who will ensure the "IETF work will explicitly
support IPv6" activities?

Policing requires a policy to be in effect, and this document creates that
policy.

It gives the IESG a consensus-based document to use in their work.

Post by Jacques Latour
Second, as an example, when this come in effect, would this draft
"https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nvo3-mcast-framework-09"
specifically exclude IPv4 specifications, meaning this new framework work
should only be applied to IPv6, and ideally make IPv6 feature rich vs.
IPv4.

While I look forward to that day, this document doesn’t do that.
I think the NVO multicast document would be covered by "No IPv4-only
feature will be added unless
there's an equivalent feature added in the IPv6 version.”

Post by Jacques Latour
Jacques

Lee

Post by Jacques Latour
-----Original Message-----
Sent: September 19, 2017 9:37 AM
Subject: Re: [sunset4] IP on draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf
Lol
I know of no IPR related to this draft.
Lee
Sent from my iPhone

Post by Marc Blanchet
Dear author,
please state if you have direct, personal knowledge of any IPR related
to this document (draft-ietf-sunset4-ipv6-ietf), and if yes, was it
disclosed, in conformance with BCPs 78 and 79.
Regards, Marc, document shepherd
_______________________________________________
sunset4 mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4

_______________________________________________
sunset4 mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4
_______________________________________________
sunset4 mailing list
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sunset4