Lee Howard
2014-02-24 21:28:35 UTC
As I was browsing the IETF agenda, I noticed several WGs and drafts whose
stated purpose was to make things work better through NAT. It reminded me
that I've been meaning to suggest this draft to this working group
(sunset4) for discussion. In London, if time permits.
http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-george-ipv6-support-02
Abstract
This document recommends that IETF formally require its standards
work to be IP version agnostic or to explicitly include support for
IPv6, with some exceptions. It further recommends that IETF revisit
and update the previous attempts to review existing standards for
IPv6 compliance. It makes this recommendation in order to ensure
that it is possible to operate without dependencies on IPv4.
This document proposes several actions. I have a feeling that some of
these proposals will provoke discussion. It's short--just a few pages.
Please glance and let us know what you think.
Thanks,
Lee Howard
stated purpose was to make things work better through NAT. It reminded me
that I've been meaning to suggest this draft to this working group
(sunset4) for discussion. In London, if time permits.
http://tools.ietf.org/search/draft-george-ipv6-support-02
Abstract
This document recommends that IETF formally require its standards
work to be IP version agnostic or to explicitly include support for
IPv6, with some exceptions. It further recommends that IETF revisit
and update the previous attempts to review existing standards for
IPv6 compliance. It makes this recommendation in order to ensure
that it is possible to operate without dependencies on IPv4.
This document proposes several actions. I have a feeling that some of
these proposals will provoke discussion. It's short--just a few pages.
Please glance and let us know what you think.
Thanks,
Lee Howard